Source comparison
TB-500 Research Continuous Glucose Monitor Notes Comparison
Mean Glucose 95–105 mg/dL 92–102 mg/dL (minimal change) Returns to baseline TB-500 doesn't lower mean glucose. Stability improves, not absolute level Coefficient of Variation (CV) 30–36% 24–29% (4–7 point drop) Returns to 30–36% Glucose variability narrows dur
This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.
- Mean Glucose
- 95–105 mg/dL
- 92–102 mg/dL (minimal change)
- Returns to baseline
- TB-500 doesn't lower mean glucose. Stability improves, not absolute level
- Coefficient of Variation (CV)
- 30–36%
- 24–29% (4–7 point drop)
- Returns to 30–36%
- Glucose variability narrows during active repair. Most consistent metric
- Time-in-Range (70–180 mg/dL)
- 85–92%
- 90–96%
- Improved TIR reflects reduced excursion amplitude, not hypoglycemia risk reduction
- Postprandial Peak Height
- 140–160 mg/dL
- 125–145 mg/dL (10–15 mg/dL lower)
- Peak blunting occurs without dietary changes. Suggests improved insulin sensitivity
- Nocturnal Glucose Nadir Timing
- 2:30–3:00 AM
- 3:00–3:30 AM (15–25 min delay)
- Reflects altered cortisol secretion during repair. Not clinically significant but reproducible