Source comparison
TB-500 Research DEXA Scan Notes: Fat vs Muscle Comparison
Total Lean Mass Change +1.2kg (+1.8%) -0.6kg (-0.9%) TB-500 shows net lean tissue gain during caloric restriction vs expected loss Regional Lean Mass (Injured Limb) -2.4% -8.3% 70% reduction in localised muscle atrophy during immobilisation Trunk Fat Mass Chan
This comparison does not assign a generated winner or score.
- Total Lean Mass Change
- +1.2kg (+1.8%)
- -0.6kg (-0.9%)
- TB-500 shows net lean tissue gain during caloric restriction vs expected loss
- Regional Lean Mass (Injured Limb)
- -2.4%
- -8.3%
- 70% reduction in localised muscle atrophy during immobilisation
- Trunk Fat Mass Change
- -1.8kg (-12%)
- -1.1kg (-7%)
- TB-500 group showed greater visceral fat reduction independent of total caloric deficit
- Bone Mineral Density (Lumbar Spine)
- +0.4% (12 weeks), +2.1% (24 weeks)
- -0.4% (24 weeks)
- Statistically significant BMD increase only after 16+ weeks of continuous use
- Subcutaneous Fat (Arms/Legs)
- -0.3kg (-8%)
- -0.2kg (-5%)
- Minimal difference. TB-500 does not preferentially mobilise peripheral fat